Friday, March 13, 2009

(title unknown)



 
 

Sent to you by cloudykid via Google Reader:

 
 

via Silliman's Blog by Ron on 3/13/09

Michael Davidson reading (MP3)

& talking with Charles Bernstein (MP3)

§

Charles Bernstein's "Morality"

§

Tim Griffin on Rae Armantrout

§

Talking with Norma Cole

"Why I am not a translator, take 2"

§

Notes on Conceptualisms

§

Allen Ginsberg: Mind-Writing Slogans

§

Talking with Michael Schiavo

§

Noah Eli Gordon on Andrew Joron

§

Tisa Bryant's Unexplained Presence

§

Merrill Gilfillan's
"A Nap by the Kickapoo"

§

The secret anthology

§

Nate Mackey's
Song of the Andoumboulou 1 to 7

§

Samuel R. Delany
at the Philadelphia Free Library
March 18

§

Collected vs. selected
in Olson & O'Hara

§

James Longenbach & the line

§

SUNY Buffalo gets funds
to digitize tapes

§

Citation as explanation:
Louis Zukofsky & Walter Benjamin

§

Two books by Ed Baker
(one with Cid Corman)

§

The First 100 Days
poem-a-day
project
has reached the halfway mark

§

Ronald Johnson, visionary

§

Reading report: Futurism

§

Oulipo in New York

§

"the poetry of the stones"

§

Close reading flarf, part 12

Part 12b & 12c

§

One less indie publisher

§

Yet another plausible
portrait of Shakespeare

§

The Best of Contemporary
Mexican Fiction

§

It's e-book week

§

The Shelley Memorial Award
goes to
Gary Young

§

The 5 rules of book cover design

§

Whatever became of Bill Barich

§

"My lunch with M.F.K. Fisher"
& Jessamyn West to boot

§

Poets who don't read
& other problems

Reading vs. writing

§

In the office with Franz Kafka

§

Alissa Valles' Orphan Fire

§

The Journals of Grace Hartigan

§

John Zorn at Yoshi's SF

Zorn & Richard Foreman
in the Astronome

§

Johnny Magic

§

What are intellectuals good for?

§

Kierkegaard the post-avant

§

Perry Anderson's
The
Origins of Postmodernity


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Collapsitarian

How's 'bout a calvinist total depravity version? And the nobility of suffering, and the incarnational reality of suffering and dying gods...

 
 

Sent to you by cloudykid via Google Reader:

 
 

via Possum Ego by Dale on 3/11/09


I found this entry on Collapsitarianism via John Robb's always-insightful blog. Kevin Kelly writes:

The idea of progress has been slowly dying. I think progress lost its allure at the ignition of the first atom bomb at the end of WWII. It has been losing luster since. Even more recently the future has become boring and unfashionable. No one wants to live in the future. The jet packs don't work, and the Daily Me is full of spam. No finds the Future attractive any longer.

The only thing left to believe in is collapse. That's not boring! The end of civilization would be terribly exciting, and unlike any future we could imagine, probably more likely. Dystopias are a favorite science fiction destination now.

We all are collapsitarians these days.



Zizek (somewhere in his expanding vastnesses) says something similar, noting how thirty years ago there would be passionate discussions on the Left about the future, but now, he asks, where have those conversations gone? No one offers thrilling visions of a future.

It is exciting to think about collapse—and the freedom—and hardship this would bring. I think there are very real climate and resource indicators to suggest that some kind of collapse is certainly possible, but the psychology of collapse, and the desire for it, compel me to think about my own attention to the gloom-n-doom fringes of contemporary culture. It's been a long time since I read Freud, but does anyone still talk about the death drive? Collapse, biologically, belongs to everyone's individual future. Perhaps the fantasy of the collapse of civilization provides a way to sooth the ego's horror of death. If I go, it all goes!

But Collapse is also itself a vision of restoration. If systems, and not only bodies, fail, some promise remains in the rearticulation of narratives of adventure that have become stale in the contemporary, cubicle-fated West. I've been looking at the folklore of the colonists who settled Texas. That corn pone world offered serious considerations of, say, how to move bodies through space, or how to track an enemy, or what to eat when there was little to be had. The lack of narratives of adventure makes life thin and uninviting in the present. Perhaps one reason for the post-War growth of Creative Writing departments had something to do with a need for adventure. Poetry promises to move us forward into new possibilities. Our other contracts with pre-Collapsarian life are fragile, delicately maintained, practicing attention to morals and manners in a world of boredom, where meaningful labor is rarely achieved. Instead, we contribute to the system's ongoing need to expand, satisfying its needs based on growth at any cost over more human needs to reveal our experience through stories and images.

On a related note, mass murders announced in Alabama and Germany today. Lone gunmen. Adventurous perversions. Maybe it's better to ask: when did the Collapse begin?

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Free US History Course from Stanford via iTunes

rockin

 
 

Sent to you by cloudykid via Google Reader:

 
 

via Free Technology for Teachers by rbyrnetech@hotmail.com (Mr. Byrne) on 3/11/09

Once again through the great Open Culture blog, I learned about a free Stanford University course being published on iTunes U. Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Jack Rakove is teaching a course about Colonial and Revolutionary America. The course will cover all of the topics typical of early American history survey courses. You can find the course here or look in the Stanford section of iTunes U. When the course is complete there will be 30 lectures available, currently there are seven lecutures posted.

Applications for Education
This course will cover topics that students have heard about from elementary school history teachers through high school history teachers. iTunes U provides high school students with an opportunity to learn in more depth about topics with which they are already familiar.

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Anne Waldman Rips It Up, Corso and Ginsberg Interview Doctor Benway



 
 

Sent to you by cloudykid via Google Reader:

 
 

via Issa's Untidy Hut by Issa's Untidy Hut on 3/11/09




Here's Anne Waldman setting the place on fire - real nice to have the quality of the material match the poet's all out delivery. Many thanks to Christina for pointing the way.





And, because, that's just not enough, try this one on for size:






To round out a Beat kind of post, check out Gregory Corso and Allen Ginsberg "interviewing" William Burroughs in 1961.

Finally, the Twitter Lilliput Poem-of-the-day - actually, 2 poems, in just 140 characters, one by W. T. Ranney and one by John Martone.

Where else will you get that, folks?


best,
Don

 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

What Part of the Brain Shouldn’t You Use?

This is very interesting. Vispo is something I experiment with.

 
 

Sent to you by cloudykid via Google Reader:

 
 

via dbqp: visualizing poetics by Geof Huth on 3/9/09

Every visual poem is about boundaries and the broaching of boundaries, so every magazine of visual poetry has to be the same, and Jukka-Pekka Kervinen's new online zine, Medulla, whose first issue is a snazzy affair small enough to drink with a couple of quick gulps, does not disappoint


The magazine opens with a few bursts of color and sublimated text, each the handiwork of Daniel f. Bradley, who has moved deftly into the world of color. The works have an inner glow that coats the eyeballs in sherbety colors, something I wouldn't expect from Daniel. Yet the pieces, almost to a man, engender a bit of disquietude. The verbal elements of these pieces are so shrunken and disguised to afford almost no help in the interpretation of the pieces, though the last ends with an ironic/dismissive phrase across the face of it ("BRIGHT CITY LIGHTS'). This first piece definitely includes the letters "SC," which seems almost to spell out "scowl" or "scud" or "screw." We are left scratching out heads but sure the word is meant not as something naturally pretty but as something a little offputting.


Jim Leftwich is one of the machines of visual poetry production (along with Jukka-Pekka, the editor), but some machines have hearts and minds, and Jim's work, which uses collage most commonly, is never merely the accumulation of random bits. The pieces talk. They make points to us. We are meant to read them. In this little collage poem, Jim takes pieces of the consumerist world, but particularly dry and boring pieces, and he mixes with them scraps of newspaper clippings about the war, presumably the War in Iraq. This is a simple anti-war message, but also anti-consumerist, and anti-so-blind-from-mindless-consumption-that-you-don't-even-notice-the-carnage-carried-out-in-your-name. This piece seems unassuming, maybe meaningless, but it is passionate in a way that only its dispassionate presentation could demonstrate.


I have to admit that I am a sucker for any image that comes from the fingers of Musicmaster, so I'm happy to see that he is working so studiously with John M. Bennett on collaborations. This one is interesting for its unsubtlety: Upon the foundation of a poem of John's, one simply printed out onto a page of paper, Musicmaster has drawn one of his surrealist figures, which appears to illustrate everything in the poem (clog, pesto, hair, noose) without clearly integrating itself with the poem. It even obscures some of the poem, restricting our ability to read it. Yet I can read it, can hear John's voice declaiming it, can appreciate how this jumbly little collaboration, a weird drawing upon a tumbling post-surrealist poem, works just perfectly because working isn't its major goal.


Everyone except for Márton Koppány has multiple pieces in this book, but Márton works unlike his compatriots. He works slowly, producing only a few tight, verbally spare yet intellectually dense pieces of conceptual visual poetry every year. And the works are demanding. He demands more out of a reader of visual poetry than any other visual poet, and he stumps me far too often. This poem above is simply the letter A (or an upside-down V), with a few clouds thrown in to complete the letter. I see in the letter the vanishing point, the two far edges of the road coming together in the distance, straight rigid lines that merely move forward, but which are impeded by these three clouds, tinged with storminess, soft yet a little menacing, soft but soft in contradistinction to the hard surety of the roadway leading to disappearance. I see travel that is planned out, designed to move forward, but which is slowed by the unexpected.


There are pieces in this magazine that even I can't consider visual poetry myself. Among these are these beautiful abstract paintings by Peter Ganick. I love the colors of these and how they swirl together, but I can see no words, no letters in these swirls. I see nothing textual and thus nothing visual poetic, but I love them just the same. Similarly, Greg Evason's drawings earlier in the magazine are merely tied little doodles and scribbles. These do not intimate written language, so we cannot assume they are related to language. So this magazine stretches beyond visual poetry without admitting it does, but what do I care? Medulla is an interesting and engaging selection, and a good way to exercise your eyes and your mind.

ecr. l'inf.

 
 

Things you can do from here: